Plan Design Strategy for Mid-Sized Employers
How to Build a Competitive and Cost-Effective Benefits Plan for 50–1500 Employees
How to Build a Competitive and Cost-Effective Benefits Plan for 50–1500 Employees
Mid-sized employers in Canada—those with 50 to 1000 employees—are stuck in a tricky middle ground.
You’re too big for cookie-cutter benefits plans but too small to access the deep customization, self-funding tools, and actuarial support enjoyed by large national employers.
As a result, many mid-sized companies end up overpaying for underperforming plans—or they overdesign and end up with rising costs, declining engagement, and painful renewals.
This article outlines a proven plan design strategy tailored for mid-sized Canadian employers. You’ll learn how to:
Structure your plan to balance cost and coverage
Segment your workforce into meaningful tiers
Use HSAs and WSAs for flexibility without overspending
Avoid hidden design flaws that drive up claims
Design a plan employees understand and value
Mid-sized organizations often face:
Limited internal HR/benefits resources
Minimal actuarial support from insurers
Inflexible insurer templates for plan design
Renewals based on opaque pooling formulas
Inconsistent communication of plan value to employees
But you also have unique advantages:
You can move quickly
You’re big enough to access multiple funding models
You have leverage with regional insurers and brokers
You can tailor benefits to your specific talent strategy
Every smart mid-sized benefits strategy includes:
Core Plan Design: What’s covered and at what levels
Funding and Cost Sharing: Who pays and how
Communication and Perception: What employees understand and value
You need all three working together to build a competitive, sustainable plan.
Your plan shouldn’t treat every employee the same.
Consider tiered plans based on:
Role (executive, manager, front-line)
Tenure (e.g., enhanced benefits after 3 years)
Division (e.g., salaried vs hourly)
Tiers don’t have to mean inequality—they allow for targeted value where it matters most.
Full flex plans (cafeteria-style) are complex, expensive to administer, and often ill-suited to mid-market employers.
Instead, use modular plans:
Offer 2–3 plan bundles (e.g., “Core,” “Enhanced”)
Let employees choose based on needs/life stage
Include HSAs for additional customization
This balances simplicity, equity, and choice without overwhelming your HR team or insurer.
Tax-free to employees
100% deductible to the employer
Covered under CRA guidelines (must be for eligible medical expenses)
Taxable to employees
Flexible: gym memberships, meditation apps, financial coaching, etc.
Boost perceived value at low cost
Tip: Offer a modest HSA/WSA combo ($250–$500 each) to boost satisfaction and reduce plan utilization.
Work with your advisor to analyze drug claims and develop cost containment strategies that don’t hurt employees.
Dental inflation is 5–8% annually. Poor design decisions include:
No co-insurance (e.g., 100% basic and major)
Ortho coverage with no lifetime max
Unlimited scaling units
No frequency limits
Smart strategies:
Use 80% co-insurance for basic and major
Set reasonable annual maximums ($1,000–$2,500)
Consider split-tier plans (e.g., managers get ortho, others don’t)
LTD and STD are complex and high risk. Key tips:
Always use non-taxable LTD if employees pay the premium
Consider third-party adjudication for STD
Review LTD waiting periods and benefit maxes
Align your LTD design with EI sickness benefits
Disability claims are costly and difficult to manage—your plan design must strike the right balance.
Limit number of visits (e.g., 15–20/year total)
Set combined maxes (e.g., $500–$1,000/year)
Focus on high-value services (e.g., physiotherapy)
Standard reimbursement: $150–$250 every 24 months
Add optional laser eye surgery top-up
Include eye exams every 24 months (not covered by all provinces)
Balance cost sharing to reduce overutilization while maintaining perceived value.
You should benchmark your plan design:
Against industry norms
Against regional and national averages
Against talent competitors
And optimize it every 2–3 years to reflect:
Workforce demographics
Inflationary pressures
Changing employee preferences
Benefit utilization data
Plan design is one of the most powerful levers you have to:
Control costs
Differentiate your employee experience
Minimize risk and overuse
Align your benefits with strategic goals
For mid-sized employers, it’s not about doing everything. It’s about doing the right things—with clarity, simplicity, and intentionality.
If you need a second opinion on your current design—or want help modeling alternatives—we’d be happy to help.