Benefits Governance and Fiduciary Responsibility
What Canadian HR and Finance Leaders Need to Know About Their Legal and Strategic Duties
What Canadian HR and Finance Leaders Need to Know About Their Legal and Strategic Duties
As Canadian group benefits plans become more complex—and more expensive—plan sponsors are under growing scrutiny to govern them responsibly.
But while most HR and Finance leaders focus on coverage levels, pricing, and employee experience, far fewer understand their fiduciary obligations, compliance risks, or governance best practices. This blind spot can lead to:
Legal exposure for errors or omissions
Data breaches or privacy violations
Tax penalties for improper plan administration
Employee dissatisfaction and mistrust
This article outlines how Canadian employers can build strong governance frameworks for their group insurance plans. We’ll explore the legal landscape, best practices for oversight, common pitfalls, and how to integrate benefits into enterprise risk management.
Group benefits are one of your largest and most regulated expenses outside of payroll. Poor governance can lead to:
Incorrect claims payments
Tax penalties for misclassified benefits
Data breaches from insurer or TPA errors
Lawsuits over denial of coverage or poor communication
Employee relations nightmares
Governance = accountability. It ensures that:
Plans are administered fairly and consistently
Roles and responsibilities are clear
Risks are identified and managed
Employees are informed and protected
Unlike pensions, group benefits in Canada are not governed by federal pension law (e.g., CAP Guidelines or PBSA). However, employers still have obligations under:
Employment law (termination clauses, promises in offer letters)
Tax law (CRA rules on taxable vs non-taxable benefits)
Human rights law (accessibility, equality of coverage)
Privacy law (PHIPA, PIPEDA, and equivalents)
Contract law (enforceability of benefits promises)
Common law fiduciary duties (in unionized and executive plans)
Implication: Benefits may not be “locked in” legally, but how you administer them is absolutely subject to legal risk.
A fiduciary is someone who acts in the best interest of plan members, with care, diligence, and loyalty.
While most Canadian benefits plans don’t have a formal fiduciary designation like pensions, employers still owe a duty of care when:
Selecting and managing insurers
Communicating benefit terms
Administering eligibility
Handling sensitive claims (e.g., disability)
Make decisions with due diligence
Avoid conflicts of interest
Ensure fair and consistent application of rules
Protect personal data and privacy
Employers should clearly document:
Who approves plan design changes (HR? CFO? Board?)
How plan design aligns with compensation strategy
When and how plan design is reviewed (annually? during budget?)
How decisions are communicated to employees
No surprises. Governance means having a consistent, transparent process.
Every year, hundreds of Canadian employers are blindsided by:
Denied disability claims due to outdated booklets
Legal disputes over coverage promised in employee letters but not in the contract
Termination lawsuits citing benefits entitlements
Match plan booklets to insurer master contracts
Update booklets with each plan change
Ensure alignment between employment agreements and benefits
Retain archived copies of historical versions
Most overpayment risk stems from ineligible dependents or inactive employees.
Governance steps:
Use clear eligibility rules (spouse definitions, student status, etc.)
Conduct annual dependent audits
Terminate benefits promptly after resignation/termination
Use payroll integration to manage eligibility in real time
Insurers will pay claims—but you may be on the hook if ineligible members were improperly enrolled.
As a plan sponsor, you’re responsible for protecting plan member data, even if a third-party insurer or administrator is handling it.
Governance responsibilities:
Ensure PHIPA/PIPEDA-compliant data handling agreements
Minimize data sharing with vendors (only what’s required)
Audit vendors for cybersecurity and breach notification policies
Train HR on privacy best practices for benefits data
Case in point: Many ASO plans involve weekly claims files being transferred between employer and insurer—are those files encrypted? Logged?
Cost containment isn’t just a financial task—it’s a governance function.
Governance responsibilities:
Document rationale for plan design choices
Review cost trends quarterly
Establish plan review processes and thresholds (e.g., trigger RFP if renewal >15%)
Align plan cost to payroll % and compensation philosophy
Example: Setting a 4% of payroll budget cap is a governance decision, not just a finance one.
Larger organizations should establish a Benefits Governance Committee made up of HR, Finance, and Legal or Risk.
Smaller organizations can use a governance calendar or delegate to the CFO/CHRO with defined roles.
Benefits plans intersect with:
Financial risk (cost inflation, liabilities)
Reputation risk (employee dissatisfaction or miscommunication)
Legal risk (contract disputes or non-compliance)
Cybersecurity risk (data breaches via insurer or TPA)
Include benefits in your:
Annual risk review
Internal audit scope
Vendor risk assessments
Best-in-class organizations treat benefits like any other critical business function.
Every 12 months, conduct a review that includes:
Plan design and funding strategy
Claims trends and renewals
Eligibility audit results
Privacy and compliance checks
Communication materials and employee understanding
Internal roles and responsibility review
Document this process—your governance file may protect you in a dispute.
Most employers think of benefits as a “set it and forget it” program. But in today’s environment—where costs are rising, compliance is tightening, and employees are demanding more—governance is no longer optional.
It protects you legally. It improves outcomes for employees. And it ensures your plan is aligned with your business and financial strategy.
If you’d like help building a governance calendar or reviewing your current oversight structure—we’re here to help.